Nov 10th, 2009, 20:39 | 只看该作者 #81 | |
Senior Member
注册日期: Nov 2008
帖子: 332
|
引用:
还要CC一份给学校?太搞笑了! |
|
|
Nov 10th, 2009, 22:02 | 只看该作者 #86 |
相忘江湖~~~
注册日期: Dec 2006
帖子: 5,568
积分:12
精华:4
声望: 26284151
|
CIVIL ARREST的条款非常含糊。用的是 “MAY"。 可以,但是并不绝对, Canada Section 494. (Criminal Code)[6] (1) ARREST WITHOUT WARRANT BY ANY PERSON Any one may arrest without warrant/s (a) a person whom he finds committing an indictable offence; or (b) a person who, on reasonable grounds, he believes (i) has committed a criminal offence, and (ii) is escaping from and freshly pursued by persons who have lawful authority to arrest that person (2) ARREST BY OWNER, ETC., OF PROPERTY Any one who is (a) the owner or a person in lawful possession of property, or (b) a person authorized by the owner or by a person in lawful possession of property may arrest without warrant a person whom he finds committing a criminal offence on or in relation to that property. (3) DELIVERY TO PEACE OFFICER Any one other than a peace officer who arrests a person without warrant shall forthwith deliver the person to a peace officer. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen's_arrest#Canada |
|
Nov 11th, 2009, 00:50 | 只看该作者 #89 | |
Senior Member
注册日期: Dec 2008
帖子: 7,161
声望: 5824918
|
引用:
在他之前,前面有个网友提了civil arrest,我也搜了一下,我认为实际上是没权利的,这有个轻重的问题,要有法官和陪审团来判。 举个例子,杀人犯也是may be sentenced to life in prinson,但是有几个人在加拿大被这么判了?法律上这么说,是给一些极端的犯罪作依据,比如严重的盗窃,伤人等。 陈望的案子为什么有分歧,就是因为这个界定不同人的理解不同,所以加美才有陪审团的结构,要这些人根据common sense 和道德观价值观来决定。 再回到搂住的案子,你可以问问本地白人怎么看这事,这件事商店绝对是做过了,她连偷都算不上,真上法庭,商店一定输。 |
|
|