May 20th, 2011, 15:17 | 只看该作者 #23 | |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 635
积分:8
精华:3
声望: 3
|
引用:
|
|
|
May 20th, 2011, 15:26 | 只看该作者 #24 | |
Senior Member
注册日期: Aug 2010
帖子: 1,485
积分:30
精华:7
声望: 64837
|
引用:
In other words, does 6Moons mean using all discrete components can make stuff sound like tube? It's confusing ... Like I said 6Moons' stuff are hard to comprehend at times ... |
|
|
May 20th, 2011, 15:39 | 只看该作者 #25 |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jan 2008
帖子: 1,974
积分:11
精华:4
声望: 1172365
|
Yes, you are right, I read in many different places about solid discrete components can make a system sound much more "tube like", whatever it means.. But oh man.. they just can't tell you straight what they feel, it has to be buried deeply and put in such a confusing way.. I wonder if all reviewers are actually WOMEN! I am pretty bad when comes to dealing with women, probably that's why I am really bad reading across lines in those reviews too.. LOL. |
|
May 20th, 2011, 16:12 | 只看该作者 #28 |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jan 2008
帖子: 1,974
积分:11
精华:4
声望: 1172365
|
You have to think what other components have been used in that review.. by the end of the day, the reviewer was listening to a WHOLE SYSTEM with player/pre-amp/power-amp/speakers/cables, each components can influence the sound, and the interactions between those components can also influence the sound as well.. so when you put this into your own system, you may or may not get what the reviewer felt during his review. Bottom line is what he/she heard it is not just that one DAC, it is that entire system. Always listen with your own ears in your own system if possible, review can be a starting point, but never put up your money solely based on someone's review.. |
|
May 20th, 2011, 16:20 | 只看该作者 #29 | |
Senior Member
注册日期: Aug 2010
帖子: 1,485
积分:30
精华:7
声望: 64837
|
引用:
But there are quite a few (small number) say the other wise ... So it's really system dependent. |
|
|
May 20th, 2011, 16:24 | 只看该作者 #31 |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jan 2008
帖子: 1,974
积分:11
精华:4
声望: 1172365
|
Not only system dependent, also depends on people's expectations, their preference on sound, even their mood in that period of time when they listening to that gear.. This thing is such a moving target, until the moment you hear it yourself, you just cannot be sure! |
|
May 20th, 2011, 16:37 | 只看该作者 #32 |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 635
积分:8
精华:3
声望: 3
|
since you guys have heard my DAC2, so that is the starting point to know how Burson should sound The rest of Burson's sounding not convered in review are: dynamic detail level imaging seperation background darkness bass/midrange texture extension 此帖于 May 20th, 2011 22:27 被 silent_fish 编辑。 |
|
May 20th, 2011, 18:35 | 只看该作者 #33 | |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 13,451
声望: 11039664
|
引用:
|
|
|
感谢 有门! 此篇文章之用户: |
hugoo (May 20th, 2011) |
May 20th, 2011, 21:59 | 只看该作者 #35 |
软件基本靠载 硬件基本靠拆
注册日期: Jul 2004
住址: GTA
帖子: 13,253
积分:52
精华:18
声望: 3174223
|
没多少惊喜。1/10价钱的机不可比吧。sgyyz那台比Aune多一点点高低频,主要是高频。Aune感觉平了一些。区别都没两根喇叭线大。实际上我用Aune的数码输出到DENON N7解码(最高是24BIT/96K的)高频也要好一点点。听觉上悦耳一点,毕竟数字传输。同时感觉就数码声多了。我认为只有UP SAMPLING可能会有好一点点的表现。这是我用AUDIO DVD的体会。SACD也是这个道理,DSD解码输出是可以不需要低通滤波器的。
|
|
May 21st, 2011, 10:08 | 只看该作者 #39 |
别当真
|
这种用分立器件电路,可以打个比方,如对冲基金经理和指数的区别,90 % 的基金经理5年不光做不过指数,还有60% 倒闭,但剩下的也许5 %, 会得到几倍于指数的收益。 能做分立的,难在质量控制,和他们的设计测试水平,故障率一定会比集成高很多,在理论上,信号干扰会小许多,有利于音场和小信号的表现,还可以调进自己的个性声音。 但实际上,有赖于这家公司是不是真正的模拟分立大家,国内也有很多不用opamp IC, 只做分立的,作出名声了吗? 所以我说得找找负面评论以判断这家公司是不是如好多国内公司般只是卖个噱头,似乎如你说的有点冷门,但确实有烧友发现故障率有点高。 此帖于 May 21st, 2011 10:38 被 lighting 编辑。 |
|
感谢 lighting 此篇文章之用户: |
hugoo (May 21st, 2011) |