May 27th, 2011, 11:27 | 只看该作者 #81 |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 635
积分:8
精华:3
|
看到童鞋门讨论得那么热烈,也插上两句 * proac不是典型的英国箱,声言偏lean, transparent * 大箱的灵敏度一般比较高,好推 Grand utopia的灵敏度是94db http://www.focal-utopia.co.uk/grandedata.pdf wilson audio sasha 91db http://www.wilsonaudio.com/product_sash_specs.shtml Proac2.5 只有 86db,实测更低 http://www.proac-loudspeakers.com/da...t5_Leaflet.pdf *我不反对任何暑假箱包括监听箱,以hugoo的空间,可以上落地箱 此帖于 May 27th, 2011 11:50 被 silent_fish 编辑。 |
|
May 27th, 2011, 12:15 | 只看该作者 #83 |
别当真
|
Hugoo & 100hz 烧得都成神仙,不用睡觉了,我昨天上夜班,下班时你们还在讨论,现在起床后,你们怎么还在讨论? Hugoo 你不是另类,我也是喜欢监听风格的声音,你看我早就不用Pre-amp 了,从播放器100% 输出到功放Pure Direct mode. 你喜欢没衰减的高音,我也是!我就喜欢空气感十足的高频,耳朵受不了?不会,这样才能让人Exciting! 我有一对老Yamaha 监听室音箱, 声音就是没空气感,以为是分频电容老化了,换了新的,也还是老样子。可能是老高音单体材料相比现代的,差了许多。 不过我是需要强烈超低频的人,和你不一样,也许我的心脏够劲。 |
独乐乐,不若与众乐乐!
|
|
|
May 27th, 2011, 13:47 | 只看该作者 #88 |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jan 2008
帖子: 1,974
积分:11
精华:4
声望: 1172365
|
Well, it's very good as a DIY speaker, and 音色 is pretty nice for sure. But for ME, I don't judge a speaker solely based on its 音色. In terms of 解析, transperancy , separation of instruments and stereo imaging, there is a LOT have been left to be desired.. 特别是在听jazz的时候,背境里的那种沙沙声太浑浊,几乎让人错觉成底噪, my brain was confused, and had to work very hard to distinguish what is noise, what is instrument, and where the instruments are located in the sound field, that just killed my enjoyment of music.. Just for me, I will trade a speaker with supernatural 音色 but with average imaging and transparency, to a speaker with average 音色 but has pinpointing 3D like sound image and great transparency any day any time.. and that's why I think my $200 m-audio little speaker is a tremendous value to ME. 此帖于 May 27th, 2011 14:17 被 hugoo 编辑。 |
|
May 27th, 2011, 19:16 | 只看该作者 #99 | |
Senior Member
注册日期: Aug 2010
帖子: 1,485
积分:30
精华:7
声望: 64837
|
引用:
要用它的音量控制就必须经过它的preamp。Preamp除了音量控制和input select,没其它功能了。要bypass preamp,得把RCA输出直接去power amp RCA输入,然后用播放软件的dithered volume control来控制音量。J River的数码音量控制很不错说。。。 |
|
|